CSCT News

[ back to news archive ]


2 of "Dirty Dozen" in Area
December 2, 2003 - Worcester Telegram & Gazette

By John J. Morgan, T&G Staff

BOSTON - Two Central Massachusetts businesses were named on the Toxics Action Center's annual "dirty dozen" list of polluters in the state yesterday, but officials of those companies are saying the citation is a bad rap.

"I can't believe these guys are doing that to us," said James F. "Jeff" Crowley of Wachusett Mountain Associates Inc. when he heard his company was on this year's list.

"I fully expected to hear about the typical smokestack heavy polluter-type company" when he heard a radio news report about the list yesterday, he said. "It sounded almost like a joke that we were included, because we have a good environmental track record."

But not everyone agrees with decisions to allow the company to expand the ski operations on
Wachusett Mountain. The expansion got under way this fall. After a long-running legal battle and scaling back the size of the area to be cleared for new trails, 8 acres of red oaks on the mountain were cut down over the protest of some local residents and the Sierra Club.

"Wachusett Mountain Associates is on the list because of what they are doing to a public reservation," said
Toxics Action Center spokesman Jay Rasku.

Also saying he was surprised to see his company on the list was Ben Harvey of E.L. Harvey and Sons of Westboro, a company that has a large trash collection, recycling and disposal business.

"We were surprised because we feel we have done an excellent job on the things we do around here," said Mr. Harvey. "I think our record and what we have done in the state will speak for itself."

The company was cited by the
Toxics Action Center over plans to expand its operations near the Hopkinton-Westboro town line with three new buildings to sort and recycle residential, commercial and demolition waste. Company officials said they are expanding in the hope of helping to meet a state goal of allowing no more than 20 percent of the waste going to landfills and incinerators to be made up of recyclable materials.

The company's plans also include construction of a new garage for its fleet of trucks.

Carol W. DeVeuve of Hopkinton, a neighbor to the
Harvey facility, which has a closed landfill on its property, said she wants the expansion stopped. She said the project is taking place in a water protection overlay district and that potential pollution from the closed landfill could threaten local drinking water.

Controversy over the plans was heightened earlier this year when it was found that wells, installed when the landfill was closed to detect any leakage of pollutants into underlying groundwater, had not been tested over a 10-year period.

Mr. Harvey conceded that the wells should have been tested every year; he said they now are being tested quarterly. While an initial set of tests found high pH levels and benzene in the groundwater wells, a second round of tests has found no pollution.

Mr. Harvey said that neither the state Department of Environmental Protection nor the local Board of Health took steps to make sure the testing of the wells was done over that 10-year period. "The DEP and Board of Health should have been pushing for the tests, but it fell through the cracks," Mr. Harvey said.

The selection for the list comes as a harsh blow for the company, which has prided itself on development of recycling systems for trash, and for easing the public acceptance of recycling here during the 1990s. When some companies resisted transition to recycling, E.L. Harvey was among the first to promote recycling as a viable way to reduce the need for landfills and incinerators.

At
Wachusett Mountain, company officials said they scaled back their expansion plan after it was found that the larger original plan would affect old growth forest.

"We compromised and scaled it back ... from 19 to 8 acres," Mr. Crowley said of the expansion, which was approved by the state, which owns the mountain.

Mr. Crowley notes that some 300 acres of land in towns around the mountain in northern
Central Massachusetts have been protected through an open space fund that receives a percentage of the revenues from the ski area operation.

In addition, he said, the company has received citations from groups such as the Massachusetts Audubon Society for energy saving steps it has taken.

Others cited on the list were:

Aquatic Control Technology and Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation for plans to use the pesticide diquat bromide, a suspected carcinogen and toxic pesticide, to treat weed growth in
Lake Cochituate in Natick, near town drinking water wells.

Champion City Recovery, over plans to expand a trash transfer station 300 feet from a town drinking water supply.

Dominion Power, owner of two nuclear power plants in
Connecticut, which the group claims are damaging Long Island Sound, producing nuclear waste, and posing a terrorism threat.

New England Sand and Gravel of Framingham, where the group claims operations threaten area drinking water supplies.

Gutierrez Co. of Stoneham, for seeking approval to use public park land for a parking lots for corporate offices being built in the middle of a large conservation area.

New England Landfill Solutions of Brockton, for a landfill-capping project residents claim has brought large quantities of additional waste to the landfill causing health threats and pollution for nearby residents.

RESCO Incinerator in
Saugus, for seeking to expand its incinerator operations after years of emissions of toxic air pollutants.

TruGreen ChemLawn of North Andover, for pushing residents to sign up for pesticide lawn treatments in exchange for donations to local soccer leagues.

U.S. Navy and Department of Defense, for maintaining toxic dumps at the South Weymouth Naval Air Station that is home to 12 national Superfund sites that residents fear have caused a host of disease threats to residents.

Valley Mill Corp. of
Pittsfield, for seeking to build a waste processing and transfer station in a blue-collar neighborhood, which opponents claim would pollute their neighborhood.
 

[ back to news archive ]
 

 

(C) 2003 Cedar Swamp Conservation Trust. All Rights Reserved.